[PATCH 3.10 48/56] drm/qxl: return IRQ_NONE if it was not our irq

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit fbb60fe35ad579b511de8604b06a30b43846473b upstream.

Return IRQ_NONE if it was not our irq. This is necessary for the case
when qxl is sharing irq line with a device A in a crash kernel. If qxl
is initialized before A and A's irq was raised during this gap,
returning IRQ_HANDLED in this case will cause this irq to be raised
again after EOI since kernel think it was handled but in fact it was
not.

Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_irq.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_irq.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ irqreturn_t qxl_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS
 
 	pending = xchg(&qdev->ram_header->int_pending, 0);
 
+	if (!pending)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
 	atomic_inc(&qdev->irq_received);
 
 	if (pending & QXL_INTERRUPT_DISPLAY) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/