Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes

From: Kees Cook
Date: Mon Jul 28 2014 - 19:42:47 EST

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here:
>>>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part?
>>> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most
>>> sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question?
>> Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you
>> carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm
>> open to how to coordinate timing.
> You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well?

If that makes sense as far as the coordination, that's fine with me.
Otherwise I'm not sure how x86 can build without having the seccomp
changes in your tree.


Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at