Re: [RFC 3/5] regulator: core: Only apply constraints if available on list voltage

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Mark, thanks a lot for all your feedback.

On 07/29/2014 07:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:28:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> 
>> But for load switches that don't define a voltage output, the parent
>> supply voltage is used so the constraints should only be applied if
>> they were defined for the child regulators.
> 
> No, think about what you're doing here and why we're filtering out
> unsettable voltages - this causes problems for consumers on regulators
> that don't have any ability to vary voltages since they will now be able
> to list voltages that they can't select.  
> 

Understood. Thanks for the explanation.

> I would also expect any regulator where the supplied devices are able to
> vary the voltage to explicitly provide a constraint even if the
> implementation is done in a parent regulator.  There may be constraints
> on the child supply which aren't directly present on the parent supply
> and can be ignored if the child supply is turned off.
> 

Agreed, if I explicitly set the voltage constraints on the child supply then
this patch is indeed not needed.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/