Re: [PATCH -v4] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> The rationale of this system call is to provide resiliance against
> file descriptor exhaustion attacks, where the attacker consumes all
> available file descriptors, forcing the use of the fallback code where
> /dev/[u]random is not available.  Since the fallback code is often not
> well-tested, it is better to eliminate this potential failure mode
> entirely.

I'm not sure I understand the rationale; if someone can eat all your
file descriptors, he can make you stop working. So you can just stop
working when you can't open /dev/urandom, no?

Fallback code is probably very bad idea to use...

> The other feature provided by this new system call is the ability to
> request randomness from the /dev/urandom entropy pool, but to block
> until at least 128 bits of entropy has been accumulated in the
> /dev/urandom entropy pool.  Historically, the emphasis in the
> /dev/urandom development has been to ensure that urandom pool is
> initialized as quickly as possible after system boot, and preferably
> before the init scripts start execution.

Sounds like ioctl() for /dev/urandom for this behaviour would be nice?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/