On 2014-07-01 12:12, Borislav Petkov wrote:Sorry for the delay.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 05:42:26PM -0700, behanw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Behan, Jan-Simon,
From: Behan Webster <behanw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Ok, just to make sure I understand that whole use case correctly:
Only consider clang warnings in Kbuild when using the clang compiler.
Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
index 6564350..e350127 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ warning-1 += $(call cc-option, -Wmissing-include-dirs)
warning-1 += $(call cc-option, -Wunused-but-set-variable)
warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-field-initializers)
-# Clang
+ifeq ($(COMPILER),clang)
warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, initializer-overrides)
warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-value)
warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, format)
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, sign-compare)
warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, format-zero-length)
warning-1 += $(call cc-disable-warning, uninitialized)
warning-1 += $(call cc-option, -fcatch-undefined-behavior)
+endif
The disabling of those warnings is really intended for the case where
people build the kernel with "W=1" on the make cmdline *and* clang?
can you explain why are those -Wno-... options needed in the W=1 case?
The whole point of the W= option is to enable noisy warnings, so I don't
quite get why you want to silence these.