Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jul 31 2014 - 06:42:58 EST
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:39:40AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:24:05 +0800
> Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> > commit a43455a1d572daf7b730fe12eb747d1e17411365 ("sched/numa: Ensure task_numa_migrate() checks the preferred node")
> >
> > ebe06187bf2aec1 a43455a1d572daf7b730fe12e
> > --------------- -------------------------
> > 94500 ~ 3% +115.6% 203711 ~ 6% ivb42/hackbench/50%-threads-pipe
> > 67745 ~ 4% +64.1% 111174 ~ 5% lkp-snb01/hackbench/50%-threads-socket
> > 162245 ~ 3% +94.1% 314885 ~ 6% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Jirka Hladky has reported a regression with that changeset as
> well, and I have already spent some time debugging the issue.
So assuming those numbers above are the difference in
numa_hint_local_faults, the report is actually a significant
_improvement_, not a regression.
On my IVB-EP I get similar numbers; using:
PRE=`grep numa_hint_faults_local /proc/vmstat | cut -d' ' -f2`
perf bench sched messaging -g 24 -t -p -l 60000
POST=`grep numa_hint_faults_local /proc/vmstat | cut -d' ' -f2`
echo $((POST-PRE))
tip/mater+origin/master tip/master+origin/master-a43455a1d57
local total local total
faults time faults time
19971 51.384 10104 50.838
17193 50.564 9116 50.208
13435 49.057 8332 51.344
23794 50.795 9954 51.364
20255 49.463 9598 51.258
18929.6 50.2526 9420.8 51.0024
3863.61 0.96 717.78 0.49
So that patch improves both local faults and runtime. Its good (even
though for the runtime we're still inside stdev overlap, so ideally I'd
do more runs).
Now I also did a run with the proposed patch, NUMA_SCALE/8 variant, and
that slightly reduces both again:
tip/master+origin/master+patch
local total
faults time
21296 50.541
12771 50.54
13872 52.224
23352 50.85
16516 50.705
17561.4 50.972
4613.32 0.71
So for hackbench a43455a1d57 is good and the proposed patch is making
things worse.
Let me see if I can still find my SPECjbb2005 copy to see what that
does.
Attachment:
pgp20oLlS9uLV.pgp
Description: PGP signature