The board uses aic3106 for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
index 09118c72e83f..b9ef2be0b145 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
@@ -51,6 +51,20 @@
tps: tps@48 {
reg = <0x48>;
};
+ tlv320aic3106: tlv320aic3106@1b {
Also, the ePAPR standard [1] says:
The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the
device and not its precise programming model.
True. This is why the node for the audio support is named as 'sound'. For the
components, like in this case I do not see issue to call the audio codec with
it's name.