Re: [PATCH] efi-bgrt: Add error handling; inform the user when ignoring the BGRT
From: Josh Triplett
Date: Fri Aug 01 2014 - 12:12:17 EST
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:19:49AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> (Including akpm, the __GFP_NOWARN police)
Andrew suggested __GFP_NOWARN here in the first place.
> On Thu, 31 Jul, at 09:11:33AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> > I started to add an explicit limit, but any reasonable limit (large
> > enough for modern screens) would be large enough that there's still a
> > non-trivial possibility of allocation failure. And I think it makes
> > sense for BGRT image allocation to be non-fatal and minimally noisy
> > (just a single-line error, not a scary-looking allocation warning),
> > considering the highly optional and cosmetic nature of BGRT. So, I
> > believe __GFP_NOWARN makes sense.
>
> Yes, I agree that we don't want to trigger the page allocator warning,
> but I don't agree that passing __GFP_NOWARN is OK, which is why I'm
> advocating some size limit checks.
>
> We need to distinguish between "Your BGRT image size is huge, and
> assumed buggy" and "Your BGRT looks valid, but we ran out of memory".
>
> We've already got enough problems with the EFI code because we silently
> paper over bugs, and using the page allocator's failure path as a way to
> check for buggy BGRT images just doesn't make any sense to me at all.
>
> If we get the limit wrong, it's not the end of the world, we can change
> it later, but it's a safe bet that if the firmware engineers start
> seeing "BGRT is buggy" in the kernel log they're going to start a
> dialogue with us.
The original bug report was about an allocation failure for a fairly
reasonable BGRT size. We can certainly prohibit absurdly huge ones (for
instance, bigger than the maximum likely screen resolution times 4 bytes
per pixel), but allocation failures may well occur for smaller sizes,
and I don't think we want to spew a massive warning for that either.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/