Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Hello,
>  Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic
> bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still
> needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's.
> 
> Changes since v9:
>  o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT() 

Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up
a git tree and making sure it's included in -next?  Just send Stephen a
mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it.

I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not
been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it
might be a bit much to try to merge it this window.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature