Re: checkpatch.pl report about "Missing blank line after declarations" in a structure definition

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:50 +0000, Dotan Barak wrote:
> I think that allowing a prefix is reasonable (to allow modules to add more flexibility).
> I tried the suggested change and it still didn't work for me.
> 
> The following change worked for me:
> (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[A-Z_]*\s*\(|
> 
> But, maybe it is better to be even more general and allow:
> (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[ A-Z0-9_]*\s*\(|

Maybe:

(?:$Storage\s+)(?:[A-Z_][A-Z0-9]+_){0,2}(?:DEFINE|DECLARE)(?:_[A-Z0-9]+){1,2}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/