[PATCH 3.2 39/94] fuse: timeout comparison fix

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2.62-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>

commit 126b9d4365b110c157bc4cbc32540dfa66c9c85a upstream.

As suggested by checkpatch.pl, use time_before64() instead of direct
comparison of jiffies64 values.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/fuse/dir.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int fuse_dentry_revalidate(struct
 	inode = ACCESS_ONCE(entry->d_inode);
 	if (inode && is_bad_inode(inode))
 		return 0;
-	else if (fuse_dentry_time(entry) < get_jiffies_64()) {
+	else if (time_before64(fuse_dentry_time(entry), get_jiffies_64())) {
 		int err;
 		struct fuse_entry_out outarg;
 		struct fuse_conn *fc;
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ int fuse_update_attributes(struct inode
 	int err;
 	bool r;
 
-	if (fi->i_time < get_jiffies_64()) {
+	if (time_before64(fi->i_time, get_jiffies_64())) {
 		r = true;
 		err = fuse_do_getattr(inode, stat, file);
 	} else {
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static int fuse_permission(struct inode
 	    ((mask & MAY_EXEC) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))) {
 		struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
 
-		if (fi->i_time < get_jiffies_64()) {
+		if (time_before64(fi->i_time, get_jiffies_64())) {
 			refreshed = true;
 
 			err = fuse_perm_getattr(inode, mask);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/