Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tip tree

[John Stultz]

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:07:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
>>> lib/Kconfig.debug between commit e704f93af5a0 ("kernel: time: Add
>>> udelay_test module to validate udelay") from the tip tree and commit
>>> 0a8adf584759 ("test: add firmware_class loader test") from the
>>> driver-core tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>>> is required).
>>
>> Looks good, thanks.
>
> For keeping things regularized, could this module instead be named
> "test_udelay", to match the rest of most of the test modules?
> (Starting with "test_".)

Sure. I'll spin up a patch to change it and will submit here shortly.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/