Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

[Ben Hutchings]

On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 10:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.62 release.
> > There are 94 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 06 17:00:00 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> Build results:
> 	total: 111 pass: 105 fail: 6
> Failed builds:
> 	microblaze:mmu_defconfig
> 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> 	mips:allmodconfig
> 	sparc64:allmodconfig
> 	xtensa:defconfig
> 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu tests all passed.
> 
> This is a significant improvement over the previous versions, where we used
> to see up to 10 build failures. The previously failing builds for unicore32
> and score now pass, as well as alpha:allmodconfig.

Yes, I spent a little while digging out build fixes.

I tried to fix the mips allmodconfig build, but failed - it needs
d3ce88431892, but that depends on 20082595d341, bef9ae3d883c, and
further changes I couldn't identify. 

I was unable to reproduce the sparc64 allmodconfig build failure, which
is in samples/hidraw - it built for me without warnings or errors.
Could you give me a bit more detail about the test setup?

Ben.

> Note that I rearranged arm builds to improve test coverage.
> 
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part