[PATCH 3.10 17/27] x86_64/entry/xen: Do not invoke espfix64 on Xen

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 7209a75d2009dbf7745e2fd354abf25c3deb3ca3 upstream.

This moves the espfix64 logic into native_iret.  To make this work,
it gets rid of the native patch for INTERRUPT_RETURN:
INTERRUPT_RETURN on native kernels is now 'jmp native_iret'.

This changes the 16-bit SS behavior on Xen from OOPSing to leaking
some bits of the Xen hypervisor's RSP (I think).

[ hpa: this is a nonzero cost on native, but probably not enough to
  measure. Xen needs to fix this in their own code, probably doing
  something equivalent to espfix64. ]

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7b8f1d8ef6597cb16ae004a43c56980a7de3cf94.1406129132.git.luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h     |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S          |   28 ++++++++++------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c |    2 --
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline notrace unsigned long arch
 
 #define PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME	/*  */
 
-#define INTERRUPT_RETURN	iretq
+#define INTERRUPT_RETURN	jmp native_iret
 #define USERGS_SYSRET64				\
 	swapgs;					\
 	sysretq;
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1056,27 +1056,24 @@ restore_args:
 	RESTORE_ARGS 1,8,1
 
 irq_return:
+	INTERRUPT_RETURN
+
+ENTRY(native_iret)
 	/*
 	 * Are we returning to a stack segment from the LDT?  Note: in
 	 * 64-bit mode SS:RSP on the exception stack is always valid.
 	 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
 	testb $4,(SS-RIP)(%rsp)
-	jnz irq_return_ldt
+	jnz native_irq_return_ldt
 #endif
 
-irq_return_iret:
-	INTERRUPT_RETURN
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(irq_return_iret, bad_iret)
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-ENTRY(native_iret)
+native_irq_return_iret:
 	iretq
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(native_iret, bad_iret)
-#endif
+	_ASM_EXTABLE(native_irq_return_iret, bad_iret)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
-irq_return_ldt:
+native_irq_return_ldt:
 	pushq_cfi %rax
 	pushq_cfi %rdi
 	SWAPGS
@@ -1098,7 +1095,7 @@ irq_return_ldt:
 	SWAPGS
 	movq %rax,%rsp
 	popq_cfi %rax
-	jmp irq_return_iret
+	jmp native_irq_return_iret
 #endif
 
 	.section .fixup,"ax"
@@ -1184,13 +1181,8 @@ __do_double_fault:
 	cmpl $__KERNEL_CS,CS(%rdi)
 	jne do_double_fault
 	movq RIP(%rdi),%rax
-	cmpq $irq_return_iret,%rax
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-	je 1f
-	cmpq $native_iret,%rax
-#endif
+	cmpq $native_irq_return_iret,%rax
 	jne do_double_fault		/* This shouldn't happen... */
-1:
 	movq PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack),%rax
 	subq $(6*8-KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET),%rax	/* Reset to original stack */
 	movq %rax,RSP(%rdi)
@@ -1658,7 +1650,7 @@ error_sti:
  */
 error_kernelspace:
 	incl %ebx
-	leaq irq_return_iret(%rip),%rcx
+	leaq native_irq_return_iret(%rip),%rcx
 	cmpq %rcx,RIP+8(%rsp)
 	je error_swapgs
 	movl %ecx,%eax	/* zero extend */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ DEF_NATIVE(pv_irq_ops, irq_disable, "cli
 DEF_NATIVE(pv_irq_ops, irq_enable, "sti");
 DEF_NATIVE(pv_irq_ops, restore_fl, "pushq %rdi; popfq");
 DEF_NATIVE(pv_irq_ops, save_fl, "pushfq; popq %rax");
-DEF_NATIVE(pv_cpu_ops, iret, "iretq");
 DEF_NATIVE(pv_mmu_ops, read_cr2, "movq %cr2, %rax");
 DEF_NATIVE(pv_mmu_ops, read_cr3, "movq %cr3, %rax");
 DEF_NATIVE(pv_mmu_ops, write_cr3, "movq %rdi, %cr3");
@@ -50,7 +49,6 @@ unsigned native_patch(u8 type, u16 clobb
 		PATCH_SITE(pv_irq_ops, save_fl);
 		PATCH_SITE(pv_irq_ops, irq_enable);
 		PATCH_SITE(pv_irq_ops, irq_disable);
-		PATCH_SITE(pv_cpu_ops, iret);
 		PATCH_SITE(pv_cpu_ops, irq_enable_sysexit);
 		PATCH_SITE(pv_cpu_ops, usergs_sysret32);
 		PATCH_SITE(pv_cpu_ops, usergs_sysret64);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/