Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: nand: omap: Revert to using software ECC by default

[pekon]

Hi Roger,

On Tuesday 05 August 2014 09:45 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > For v3.12 and prior, 1-bit Hamming code ECC via software was the
> > default choice. Commit c66d039197e4 in v3.13 changed the behavior
> > to use 1-bit Hamming code via Hardware using a different ECC layout
> > i.e. (ROM code layout) than what is used by software ECC.
As per OMAP3 TRM [1], the NAND ECC layout required for
NAND boot is same as that of OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_HW. So
above mentioned 'commit c66d039197e4' does not break
backward compatibility as far as NAND boot is concerned.

AFAIK, all users on OMAP3 used HAM1_HW which is same
as HAM1 today. So unless we have a real OMAP3 user who
(1) had created file-system using HAM1_SW &&
(2) now wants to migrate to new kernel, I don't think
its wise to re-introduce HAM1_SW4 ECC schemes.

Instead we are trying to push OMAP3 users to migrate to
BCH4_SW (supported by ROM) or BCH8_SW ECC schemes.

Please understand
commit c66d039197e42af8867e5d0d9b904daf0fb9e6bc
was part of larger series to clean-up NAND driver and
remove obsolete or redundant code. So this was
intentional change.



> > This ECC layout change causes NAND filesystems created in v3.12
> > and prior to be unusable in v3.13 and later. So revert back to
> > using software ECC by default if an ECC scheme is not explicitely
> > specified.
> >
> > This defect can be observed on the following boards during legacy 
> > boot
> >
> > -omap3beagle
> > -omap3touchbook
> > -overo
> > -am3517crane
> > -devkit8000
> > -ldp
> > -3430sdp
>
> omap3pandora is also using sw ecc, with ubifs. Some time ago I tried
> booting mainline (I think it was 3.14) with rootfs on NAND, and while
> it did boot and reached a shell, there were lots of ubifs errors, fs
> got corrupted and I lost all my data. I used to be able to boot
> mainline this way fine sometime ~3.8 release. It's interesting that
> 3.14 was able to read the data, even with wrong ecc setup.
>
> Do you think it's safe again to boot ubifs created on 3.2 after
> applying this series?
Are you sure you are using "sw" ECC scheme ?
Can you please share the ecc-layout of the NAND page, because
as per [1] you should not be able to Boot from NAND then.

IIRC..
- ECC layout of HAM1_SW has ECC bytes towards end of OOB-section.
- ECC layout of HAM1_HW has ECC bytes towards staring of OOB section.


with regards, pekon


[1] http://www.ti.com/product/omap3530
http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruf98  (Revision Y)
Chapter 25: Initialization
Section: 25.4.7 Memory Booting
	Sub-Section: NAND
	Figure 25-19. ECC Locations in NAND Spare Areas


------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/