Re: [PATCH] Thermal: imx: add i.mx6sx thermal support

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:25:53AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > @@ -31,6 +32,10 @@
> >  
> >  #define MISC0				0x0150
> >  #define MISC0_REFTOP_SELBIASOFF		(1 << 3)
> > +#define MISC1				0x0160
> > +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPHIGH		(1 << 29)
> > +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPLOW		(1 << 28)
> > +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPPANIC		(1 << 27)
> 
> how about using 
> +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPHIGH		BIT(29)
> +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPLOW		BIT(28)
> +#define MISC1_IRQ_TEMPPANIC		BIT(27)

While I agree this is good, I think it's more important to keep the
style consistent for the file.  We already have a number of (1 << x)
in the file.

...

> > @@ -66,6 +76,21 @@ enum imx_thermal_trip {
> >  #define FACTOR1				15976
> >  #define FACTOR2				4297157
> >  
> > +#define TEMPMON_V1			1
> > +#define TEMPMON_V2			2
> > +
> 
> where does the V1/V2 nomenclature come from? how about:
> 
> +#define TEMPMON_IMX6Q			1
> +#define TEMPMON_IMX6SX			2

+1

If the V1/V2 nomenclature is not coming from hardware manual, we don't
want to use it, neither code nor binding doc.

Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/