Re: [PATCH 3.10 12/27] x86-64, espfix: Dont leak bits 31:16 of %esp returning to 16-bit stack

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:16:20PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:14:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> <...>
> > @@ -188,17 +193,21 @@ static void note_page(struct seq_file *m
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Now print the actual finished series
> >  		 */
> > -		seq_printf(m, "0x%0*lx-0x%0*lx   ",
> > -			   width, st->start_address,
> > -			   width, st->current_address);
> > -
> > -		delta = (st->current_address - st->start_address) >> 10;
> > -		while (!(delta & 1023) && unit[1]) {
> > -			delta >>= 10;
> > -			unit++;
> > +		if (!st->marker->max_lines ||
> > +		    st->lines < st->marker->max_lines) {
> > +			seq_printf(m, "0x%0*lx-0x%0*lx   ",
> > +				   width, st->start_address,
> > +				   width, st->current_address);
> > +
> > +			delta = (st->current_address - st->start_address) >> 10;
> > +			while (!(delta & 1023) && unit[1]) {
> > +				delta >>= 10;
> > +				unit++;
> > +			}
> > +			seq_printf(m, "%9lu%c ", delta, *unit);
> > +			printk_prot(m, st->current_prot, st->level);
> >  		}
> > -		seq_printf(m, "%9lu%c ", delta, *unit);
> > -		printk_prot(m, st->current_prot, st->level);
> > +		st->lines++;
> >  
> >  		/*
> >  		 * We print markers for special areas of address space,
> 
> Hmm... the original commit has a 2nd hunk here that does seem to be
> applicable to 3.10.  Was this dropped accidentally or on purpose?

I don't remember at all, sorry.  What is the hunk that I missed?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/