Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Allow private data to be supplied on seq_open
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Wed Aug 06 2014 - 21:07:32 EST
Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:16:49PM +0100, Rob Jones wrote:
>
>> I'm not quite sure I understand your meaning when you say "via seq_open"
>> though, that function call format needs to stay the same or lots of
>> code will break, so I can't just add the third parameter on the end.
>> (C++ does have *some* advantages!) Can you clarify, please?
>
> seq_open_private() can be implemented as call of seq_open() +
> assignment...
This is why I object to the name seq_open_priv() for the new code.
seq_open_private() is already implemented and base on seq_open().
And the names are close enough together it is confusing :(
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/