Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pwm: rockchip: Added to support for RK3288 SoC

From: caesar
Date: Wed Aug 06 2014 - 21:27:46 EST


Doug,

å 2014å08æ07æ 06:46, Doug Anderson åé:
Caesar,

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v1 = {
+ .regs.duty = PWM_HRC,
+ .regs.period = PWM_LRC,
+ .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
+ .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
+ .prescaler = PRESCALER,
+ .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1,
+};
+
+static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
+ .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
+ .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
+ .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
+ .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
+ .prescaler = PRESCALER-1,
+ .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
+};
+
+static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
+ .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
+ .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
+ .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
+ .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
Did you really mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here? If so, that's super
confusing and deserves a comment. AKA, I think the above should not
be:

+ .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
+ .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,

...but should be

+ .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
+ .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,

If you didn't mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here, then just get rid of
pwm_data_vop and refer to pwm_data_v2. In fact, I'd suggest that you
totally remove the "rockchip,vop-pwm" since there's nothing different
between "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and "rockchip,vop-pwm".

Sorry,I think it's no problem. the "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and "rockchip,vop-pwm" are seperate PWM controllers.
They are just different registers address between CNTR and CTRL .


Have you validated Thierry's suggestion to allow you to access your
memory range?
Yes,we have solve it in lcdc driver.
The Mark Yao have the submission in [0].

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/4/20

-Doug





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/