Re: Question on release_one_tty

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:05:28PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > 
> > So how this code supposed to work then? I mean tty_driver_kref_put must never call
> > for destruct_tty_driver, otherwise we're accessing freed memory.
> 
> mod = driver->owner;
> tty_driver_kref_put(driver);
> module_put(mod);
> 
> Check the upstream whether the same issue exists there.

Same in tty.git

static void release_one_tty(struct work_struct *work)
{
	struct tty_struct *tty =
		container_of(work, struct tty_struct, hangup_work);
	struct tty_driver *driver = tty->driver;

	if (tty->ops->cleanup)
		tty->ops->cleanup(tty);

	tty->magic = 0;
	tty_driver_kref_put(driver);
	module_put(driver->owner);

	spin_lock(&tty_files_lock);
	list_del_init(&tty->tty_files);
	spin_unlock(&tty_files_lock);

	put_pid(tty->pgrp);
	put_pid(tty->session);
	free_tty_struct(tty);
}

so I think yes, the fix is needed. I'll prepare the patch
and test/post for review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/