Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Fix double free of input device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:07:17PM +0100, nick.dyer@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> index 03b8571..da497db 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> @@ -1353,8 +1353,10 @@ static int mxt_get_info(struct mxt_data *data)
>  
>  static void mxt_free_object_table(struct mxt_data *data)
>  {
> -	input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> -	data->input_dev = NULL;
> +	if (data->input_dev) {
> +		input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> +		data->input_dev = NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	kfree(data->object_table);
>  	data->object_table = NULL;
> @@ -2194,7 +2196,6 @@ static int mxt_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &mxt_attr_group);
>  	free_irq(data->irq, data);
> -	input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
>  	mxt_free_object_table(data);
>  	kfree(data);

No. Let's have mxt_free_object_table() only free object table, and let's
call input_unregister_device() explicitly where needed, like we do in
mxt_remove().

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/