Re: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcu: Add synchronous grace-period waiting for RCU-tasks

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:58:58AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> > > No, they are also used by optimized kprobes. This is why optimized
> > > kprobes depend on !CONFIG_PREEMPT. [ added Masami to the discussion ].
> > 
> > How do those work? Is that one where the INT3 relocates the instruction
> > stream into an alternative 'text' and that JMPs back into the original
> > stream at the end?
> 
> No, it's where we replace the 'int3' with a jump to a trampoline that
> simulates an INT3. Speeds things up quite a bit.

OK, so the trivial 'fix' for that is to patch the probe site like:

	preempt_disable();		INC	GS:%__preempt_count
	call trampoline;		CALL	0xDEADBEEF
	preempt_enable();		DEC	GS:%__preempt_count
					JNZ	1f
					CALL	___preempt_schedule
				1f:

At which point the preempt_disable/enable() are the read side primitives
and call_rcu_sched/synchronize_sched are sufficient to release it.

With the per-cpu preempt count stuff we have on x86 that is 4
instructions for the preempt_*() stuff -- they're 'big' instructions
though, since 3 have memops and 2 have a segment prefix.

Attachment: pgpIS7rEzN5Gj.pgp
Description: PGP signature