[PATCH 3.13 059/259] cpuset,mempolicy: fix sleeping function called from invalid context
From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Fri Aug 08 2014 - 16:50:29 EST
3.13.11.6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 391acf970d21219a2a5446282d3b20eace0c0d7a upstream.
When runing with the kernel(3.15-rc7+), the follow bug occurs:
[ 9969.258987] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586
[ 9969.359906] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 160655, name: python
[ 9969.441175] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 9969.488184] CPU: 26 PID: 160655 Comm: python Tainted: G A 3.15.0-rc7+ #85
[ 9969.581032] Hardware name: FUJITSU-SV PRIMEQUEST 1800E/SB, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 1000 Series BIOS Version 1.39 11/16/2012
[ 9969.706052] ffffffff81a20e60 ffff8803e941fbd0 ffffffff8162f523 ffff8803e941fd18
[ 9969.795323] ffff8803e941fbe0 ffffffff8109995a ffff8803e941fc58 ffffffff81633e6c
[ 9969.884710] ffffffff811ba5dc ffff880405c6b480 ffff88041fdd90a0 0000000000002000
[ 9969.974071] Call Trace:
[ 9970.003403] [<ffffffff8162f523>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
[ 9970.065074] [<ffffffff8109995a>] __might_sleep+0xfa/0x130
[ 9970.130743] [<ffffffff81633e6c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x4f0
[ 9970.200638] [<ffffffff811ba5dc>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1bc/0x210
[ 9970.272610] [<ffffffff81105807>] cpuset_mems_allowed+0x27/0x140
[ 9970.344584] [<ffffffff811b1303>] ? __mpol_dup+0x63/0x150
[ 9970.409282] [<ffffffff811b1385>] __mpol_dup+0xe5/0x150
[ 9970.471897] [<ffffffff811b1303>] ? __mpol_dup+0x63/0x150
[ 9970.536585] [<ffffffff81068c86>] ? copy_process.part.23+0x606/0x1d40
[ 9970.613763] [<ffffffff810bf28d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 9970.683660] [<ffffffff810ddddf>] ? monotonic_to_bootbased+0x2f/0x50
[ 9970.759795] [<ffffffff81068cf0>] copy_process.part.23+0x670/0x1d40
[ 9970.834885] [<ffffffff8106a598>] do_fork+0xd8/0x380
[ 9970.894375] [<ffffffff81110e4c>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x9c/0xf0
[ 9970.969470] [<ffffffff8106a8c6>] SyS_clone+0x16/0x20
[ 9971.030011] [<ffffffff81642009>] stub_clone+0x69/0x90
[ 9971.091573] [<ffffffff81641c29>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
The cause is that cpuset_mems_allowed() try to take
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex) under the rcu_read_lock(which was hold in
__mpol_dup()). And in cpuset_mems_allowed(), the access to cpuset is
under rcu_read_lock, so in __mpol_dup, we can reduce the rcu_read_lock
protection region to protect the access to cpuset only in
current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(). So that we can avoid this bug.
This patch is a temporary solution that just addresses the bug
mentioned above, can not fix the long-standing issue about cpuset.mems
rebinding on fork():
"When the forker's task_struct is duplicated (which includes
->mems_allowed) and it races with an update to cpuset_being_rebound
in update_tasks_nodemask() then the task's mems_allowed doesn't get
updated. And the child task's mems_allowed can be wrong if the
cpuset's nodemask changes before the child has been added to the
cgroup's tasklist."
Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 8 +++++++-
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 5ae9f95..0b29c52 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1236,7 +1236,13 @@ done:
int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void)
{
- return task_cs(current) == cpuset_being_rebound;
+ int ret;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ret = task_cs(current) == cpuset_being_rebound;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return ret;
}
static int update_relax_domain_level(struct cpuset *cs, s64 val)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 65c7674..b742d37 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2173,7 +2173,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old)
} else
*new = *old;
- rcu_read_lock();
if (current_cpuset_is_being_rebound()) {
nodemask_t mems = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
if (new->flags & MPOL_F_REBINDING)
@@ -2181,7 +2180,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old)
else
mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems, MPOL_REBIND_ONCE);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
atomic_set(&new->refcnt, 1);
return new;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/