Re: [PATCH linux-next] cifs: remove unused function cifs_oplock_break_wait

[Steve French]

merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Vincent StehlÃ
<vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commit 743162013d40 ("sched: Remove proliferation of wait_on_bit() action
> functions") has removed the call to cifs_oplock_break_wait, making this
> function unused; remove it.
>
> This fixes the following compilation warning:
>
>   fs/cifs/misc.c:578:1: warning: âcifs_oplock_break_waitâ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlà <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> This can be seen with e.g. linux next-20140721 and arm allmodconfig.
>
> Best regards,
>
> V.
>
>  fs/cifs/misc.c | 7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/misc.c b/fs/cifs/misc.c
> index 9a70792..65c2682 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/misc.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/misc.c
> @@ -574,13 +574,6 @@ void cifs_set_oplock_level(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode, __u32 oplock)
>                 cinode->oplock = 0;
>  }
>
> -static int
> -cifs_oplock_break_wait(void *unused)
> -{
> -       schedule();
> -       return signal_pending(current) ? -ERESTARTSYS : 0;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * We wait for oplock breaks to be processed before we attempt to perform
>   * writes.
> --
> 2.0.1
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/