Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm: rework flip-work framework

[Boris BREZILLON]

Hi Rob,

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:20:09 -0400
Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Boris BREZILLON
> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> > Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
> >> calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts.
> >>
> >> The 2nd patch of this series is optional, as it only reworks
> >> drm_flip_work_init prototype to remove unneeded size argument and
> >> return code (this function cannot fail anymore).
> >
> >
> > Atmel HLCDC driver now depends on this series and I'd like to get as
> > much thing as possible for HLCDC support in 3.18 (if the driver can't
> > make it for 3.18, at least the dependencies could).
> >
> > David, Rob (and other DRM/KMS developers) do you have any concern you
> > would like addressed in this patch series ?
> 
> it already has my r-b :-)

Yes, I know, I was just checking that you were still okay with this
series ;-).

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/