[tip:locking/core] locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment

From: tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Wed Aug 13 2014 - 06:56:22 EST


Commit-ID: aa9fc0c19bee0cbc152e0e06488095fb69229236
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/aa9fc0c19bee0cbc152e0e06488095fb69229236
Author: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:41:52 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:32:00 +0200

locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment

... as we clearly inline mcs_spin_lock() now.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: aswin@xxxxxx
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406752916-3341-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@xxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index 23e89c5..4d60986 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \
* If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
* on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
* in mcs_spin_unlock().
- *
- * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
- * time spent in this lock function.
*/
static inline
void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/