Re: [PATCH 2/7] locking/rwsem: more aggressive use of optimistic spinning

[Waiman Long]

On 08/14/2014 11:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> <create sparse vm image file of 500TB on ssd with XFS on it>
> xfs_io -f -c "truncate 500t" -c "extsize 1m" /path/to/vm/image/file
>
> <start 16p/16GB RAM vm with image file configured as:
> -drive file=/path/to/vm/image/file,if=virtio,cache=none>
>
> In vm:
>
> download and build fsmark from here:
>
> git://oss.sgi.com/dgc/fs_mark
>
> download and install xfsprogs v3.2.1 from here:
>
> git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git tags/v3.2.1
>
> Setup up the target filesystem:
>
> # mkfs.xfs -f -m "crc=1,finobt=1" /dev/vda
> # mount -o logbsize=262144,nobarrier /dev/vda /mnt/scratch
>
>
> Run:
>
> # fs_mark  -D  10000  -S0  -n  50000  -s  0  -L  32 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/0  -d  /mnt/scratch/1 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/2  -d  /mnt/scratch/3 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/4  -d  /mnt/scratch/5 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/6  -d  /mnt/scratch/7 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/8  -d  /mnt/scratch/9 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/10  -d  /mnt/scratch/11 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/12  -d  /mnt/scratch/13 \
>          -d  /mnt/scratch/14  -d  /mnt/scratch/15 \
>
> If you've got everything set up right, that should run at around
> 200-250,000 file creates/s. When finished, unmount and run:
>
> # xfs_repair -o bhash=500000 /dev/vda
>
> And that should spend quite a long while pounding on the mmap_sem
> until the the userspace buffer cache stops growing.
>
> I just ran the above on 3.16, saw this from perf:
>
>    37.30%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>     - _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>        - 62.00% rwsem_wake
>           - call_rwsem_wake
>              + 83.52% sys_mprotect
>              + 16.23% __do_page_fault
>        + 35.15% try_to_wake_up
>        + 0.96% update_blocked_averages
>        + 0.61% pagevec_lru_move_fn
> -  23.35%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
>     - _raw_spin_unlock_irq
>        + 51.37% finish_task_switch
>        + 39.37% rwsem_down_write_failed
>        + 8.49% rwsem_down_read_failed
>          0.62% run_timer_softirq
> +   5.22%  [kernel]  [k] native_read_tsc
> +   3.89%  [kernel]  [k] rwsem_down_write_failed
> .....
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.

Thank for the testing recipe. I am afraid that I can't find a 500TB SSD 
for testing purpose. Do you think the test will still be valid for 
exercising rwsem if I use a smaller SSD or maybe mechanical hard disk?

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/