Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Add PERF_PID

[Namhyung Kim]

Hi Andi,

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:12:17 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> It's currently difficult to filter out perf itself using a filter.
> This can give cascading effects during IO tracing when the IO
> perf does itself causes more trace output.
>
> The best way to filter is to use the pid. But it's difficult to get the pid
> of perf without using hacks.
>
> Add a PERF_PID meta variable to the perf filter that contains the current pid.
>
> With this patch the following works
>
> % perf record -e syscalls:sys_enter_write -a --filter 'common_pid != PERF_PID' ...
>
> This won't work for more complex perf pipe lines with multiple processes,
> but at least solves the problem nicely for a single perf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I like the idea, so with comments below fixed:

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Namhyung


[SNIP]
> +	/* Assume a pid has not more than 8 characters */
> +	pid = strstr(last->filter, "PERF_PID");
> +	if (pid) {
> +		char buf[9];
> +		snprintf(buf, 9, "%08d", getpid());

Why do you add zero-paddings?  I guess it'd confuse the parser as if
it's an octal digits.  What about just using "%8d"?  It seems the parser
ignores whitespaces between tokens..


> +		memcpy(pid, buf, 8);
> +	}
> +	fprintf(stderr, "filter |%s|\n", last->filter);

Isn't it a debug message?

Thanks,
Namhyung


>  	return 0;
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/