Re: [PATCH v6] input: drv260x: Add TI drv260x haptics driver

From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Tue Aug 19 2014 - 16:07:57 EST


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:35:06PM +0000, Murphy, Dan wrote:
> Dmitry
>
> On 08/19/2014 02:24 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:47:50AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> >> index 2ff4425..99f6762 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> >> @@ -676,4 +676,13 @@ config INPUT_SOC_BUTTON_ARRAY
> >> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> >> module will be called soc_button_array.
> >>
> >> +config INPUT_DRV260X_HAPTICS
> >> + tristate "TI DRV260X haptics support"
> >> + depends on INPUT && I2C
> >
> > This also needs "select REGMAP_I2C"
> >
>
> This one is OK
>
> >> + help
> >> + Say Y to enable support for the TI DRV260X haptics driver.
> >> +
> >> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> >> + module will be called drv260x-haptics.
> >> +
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> +#ifndef _LINUX_DRV260X_PDATA_H
> >> +#define _LINUX_DRV260X_PDATA_H
> >> +
> >> +struct drv260x_platform_data {
> >> + int enable_gpio;
> >
> > I do not see this used anywhere.
>
> But this is actually used here
>
> haptics->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&client->dev, "enable");
>
> for the non-dt case

"haptics" is not instance of drv260x_platform_data but drv260x_data which
defines:

struct drv260x_data {
...
struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
...

That one I kept.

--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/