Re: [PATCH v1 08/12] spi/pxa2xx: Don't use slave_id of dma_slave_config

From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Aug 19 2014 - 17:15:32 EST

Next message: Pranith Kumar: "[RFC PATCH] powerpc: Make SPU_FS depend on SPARSEMEM"
Previous message: Mark Brown: "Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Add support for Intel Braswell"
In reply to: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 08/12] spi/pxa2xx: Don't use slave_id of dma_slave_config"
Next in thread: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 05/12] dmaengine: dw: introduce generic filter function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:29:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> That field has been deprecated in favour of getting the necessary
> information from ACPI/DT.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Next message: Pranith Kumar: "[RFC PATCH] powerpc: Make SPU_FS depend on SPARSEMEM"
Previous message: Mark Brown: "Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Add support for Intel Braswell"
In reply to: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 08/12] spi/pxa2xx: Don't use slave_id of dma_slave_config"
Next in thread: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 05/12] dmaengine: dw: introduce generic filter function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]