Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: fix cache stale memslot info with correct mmio generation number
From: Xiao Guangrong
Date: Tue Aug 19 2014 - 20:29:55 EST
On 08/19/2014 05:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/08/2014 10:50, Xiao Guangrong ha scritto:
>> Okay, what confused me it that it seems that the single line patch
>> is ok to you. :)
>
> No, it was late and I was confused. :)
>
>> Now, do we really need to care the case 2? like David said:
>> "Sorry I didn't explain myself very well: Since we can get a single wrong
>> mmio exit no matter what, it has to be handled in userspace. So my point
>> was, it doesn't really help to fix that one very specific way that it can
>> happen, because it can just happen in other ways. (E.g. update memslots
>> occurs after is_noslot_pfn() and before mmio exit)."
>>
>> What's your idea?
>>
>>> I think if you always treat the low bit as zero in mmio sptes, you can
>>> do that without losing a bit of the generation.
>>
>> What's you did is avoiding cache a invalid generation number into spte, but
>> actually if we can figure it out when we check mmio access, it's ok. Like the
>> updated patch i posted should fix it, that way avoids doubly increase the number.
>
> Yes.
>
>> Okay, if you're interested increasing the number doubly, there is the simpler
>> one:
>
> This wastes a bit in the mmio spte though. My idea is to increase the
> memslots generation twice, but drop the low bit in the mmio spte.
Yeah, really smart idea. :)
Paolo/David, would you mind making a patch for this (+ the comments in David's
patch)?
Please feel free to add my:
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/