RE: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

[Sharma, Sanjeev]

Opps ! Thanks for review comment. Just sent V2 updated patch.

Sanjeev Sharma

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Mallon [mailto:rmallon@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 4:34 AM
To: Sharma, Sanjeev; cpw@xxxxxxx; robinmholt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

On 12/08/14 17:35, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in 
> uniprocessor configuration and can therefore not be used with 
> BUG_ON.it would be advise to replace with lockdep_assert_held().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <Sanjeev_Sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c | 6 +++---
>  drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c     | 2 +-
>  drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c      | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c 
> b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
> index 128d561..240fe5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ xpc_process_connect(struct xpc_channel *ch, unsigned 
> long *irq_flags)  {
>  	enum xp_retval ret;
>  
> -	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
> +	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));

This is incorrect, and will break the build with CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled.
You actually want:

	lockdep_assert_held(&ch->lock);

Same for the other instances.

~Ryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/