[PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h

[Zhouyi Zhou]

jump_label_ratelimit.h is split from jump_label.h to enable the 
includers who don't want linux/workqueue.h.
As HAVE_JUMP_LABEL is only defined in jump_label.h, will following  
patch makes jump_labe_ratelimit.h more tidy?

Compiled and Tested in x86_64
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
index 089f70f..0d34d7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
+++ b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
@@ -4,15 +4,12 @@
 #include <linux/jump_label.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
-#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
+#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
 struct static_key_deferred {
 	struct static_key key;
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	struct delayed_work work;
 };
-#endif
-
-#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
 extern void static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key_deferred *key);
 extern void
 jump_label_rate_limit(struct static_key_deferred *key, unsigned long rl);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/