Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] dt: dependencies (for deterministic driver initialization order based on the DT)

[Alexander Holler]

Am 21.08.2014 16:02, schrieb Thierry Reding:

> Anyway, those are all fairly standard reasons for where deferred probe
> triggers, and since I do like deferred probe for it's simplicity and
> reliability I'd rather not try to work around it if boot time is all
> that people are concerned about.

It's neither simple nor reliable. It's non deterministic brutforcing 
while making it almost impossible to identify real errors.

In my humble opinion the worst way to solve something. I'm pretty sure 
if I would have suggest such a solution, the maintainer crowd would have 
eaten me without cooking.

Regards,

Alexander Holler

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/