Re: [resend rfc v3] pwm: add BCM2835 PWM driver
From: Thierry Reding
Date: Mon Aug 25 2014 - 09:19:20 EST
Sorry for taking so long to reply to this, I had completely forgotten.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:54:46PM +0200, Bart Tanghe wrote:
> Add some better error handling and Device table support
> Added Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
There should be a description about this driver in the commit message.
The above reads like a changelog since earlier versions of this patch,
in which case it should go below a --- separator line, like so:
Commit message goes here...
...
Signed-off-by: Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
- add some better error handling
- add device tree support
I assume that "device table" was meant to be "device tree"? Also it
might be useful to mention Raspberry Pi in the commit message.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..44c0b95
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +bcm2835 PWM controller
I think this ought to be "BCM2835". Again, maybe this should mention the
Raspberry Pi so that when people search for it they get a match on this
document.
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be "bcrm,pwm-bcm2835"
According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt this
should be "brcm,...". Also I'd suggest putting the SoC first, followed
by the hardware block name:
"brcm,bcm2835-pwm"
> +- reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
> +
> +Examples:
> +
> +pwm@0x2020C000 {
> + compatible = "bcrm,pwm-bcm2835";
> + reg = <0x2020C000 0x28>;
I think other BCM2835 device tree bindings use lower-case for addresses,
so you might want to follow that for consistency. Also unit-addresses
are always in hexadecimal and shouldn't take a 0x prefix, so the above
would become:
pwm@2020c000 {
...
};
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 22f2f28..20341a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ config PWM_ATMEL_TCB
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be called pwm-atmel-tcb.
>
> +config PWM_BCM2835
> + tristate "BCM2835 PWM support"
> + depends on MACH_BCM2835 || MACH_BCM2708
> + help
> + PWM framework driver for BCM2835 controller (raspberry pi)
I think the correct capitalization would be "Raspberry Pi".
> + Only 1 channel is implemented.
How many can it take? Why haven't all been implemented?
> + The pwm core is tested with a pwm basic frequency of 1Mhz.
> + Use period above 1000ns
s/pwm/PWM/ in prose. Why this restriction? Doesn't it work with higher
frequencies? Perhaps this shouldn't be a comment in the Kconfig entry
but rather a runtime check (and error message)?
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ec9829b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
> +/*
> + * pwm-bcm2835 driver
> + * Standard raspberry pi (gpio18 - pwm0)
Just drop these two lines, they don't provide very useful information.
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +
> +/*mmio regiser mapping*/
s/mmio/MMIO/, s/regiser/register/. Also spaces after /* and before */.
> +
> +#define DUTY 0x14
> +#define PERIOD 0x10
> +#define CHANNEL 0x10
CHANNEL doesn't seem to be used.
> +
> +#define PWM_ENABLE 0x00000001
> +#define PWM_POLARITY 0x00000010
> +
> +#define MASK_CTL_PWM 0x000000FF
I prefer lowercase for hexadecimals. And there's no need to repeat all
the leading zeroes. PWM_ENABLE and PWM_POLARITY seem to be bits, so I'd
prefer:
#define PWM_ENABLE (1 << 0)
#define PWM_POLARITY (1 << 4)
> +#define CTL_PWM 0x00000081
What does this value mean? Also even if this register is at offset 0 you
should still add a symbolic name for it.
> +#define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> +#define DRIVER_DESC "A bcm2835 pwm driver - raspberry pi development platform"
These are only used once, so you don't have to #define them. Use them in
the MODULE_*() macros directly.
Also, perhaps a better and more generic description would be:
"Broadcom BCM2835 (Raspberry Pi) PWM driver"
And perhaps even drop "(Raspberry Pi)" since presumably the driver will
work on any BCM2835-based board.
> +struct bcm2835_pwm_chip {
> + struct pwm_chip chip;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int channel;
This field seems to be unused.
> + int scaler;
Perhaps this should be unsigned long instead of int?
> + void __iomem *mmio_base;
Calling this something like "base" or "regs" will save a lot of
characters when accessing registers.
> +static inline struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *to_bcm2835_pwm_chip(
> + struct pwm_chip *chip){
> +
> + return container_of(chip, struct bcm2835_pwm_chip, chip);
> +}
The preferred way to write the above is:
static inline struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *
to_bcm2835_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
...
}
Perhaps if you make names a little shorter you can even get away without
wrapping it:
static inline struct bcm2835_pwm *to_bcm2835_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
{
...
}
> +static int bcm2835_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + int duty_ns, int period_ns){
The pwm argument still fits on the first line. Also the opening brace
({) should go on a separate line.
> +
> + struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *pc;
> +
> + pc = container_of(chip, struct bcm2835_pwm_chip, chip);
This should use the to_bcm2835_pwm() function defined earlier.
> +
> + iowrite32(duty_ns/pc->scaler, pc->mmio_base + DUTY);
> + iowrite32(period_ns/pc->scaler, pc->mmio_base + PERIOD);
These should use writel() instead of iowrite32() and there need to be
spaces around '/'.
> +static int bcm2835_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm){
Same as above.
> +
> + struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *pc;
> +
> + pc = container_of(chip, struct bcm2835_pwm_chip, chip);
Should use to_bcm2835_pwm() and can go on a single line:
struct bcm2835_pwm *pc = to_bcm2835_pwm(chip);
> +
> + iowrite32(ioread32(pc->mmio_base) | PWM_ENABLE, pc->mmio_base);
Please break this up into:
u32 value;
...
value = readl(pc->mmio_base + ...);
value |= PWM_ENABLE;
writel(value, pc->mmio_base + ...);
> +static void bcm2835_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *pc;
> +
> + pc = to_bcm2835_pwm_chip(chip);
The above can go on a single line.
> +
> + iowrite32(ioread32(pc->mmio_base) & ~PWM_ENABLE, pc->mmio_base);
> +}
Same as above and below.
> +static int bcm2835_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *pwm;
> +
Gratuitous blank line.
> + int ret;
> + struct resource *r;
> + u32 start, end;
start and end don't seem to be used.
> + struct clk *clk;
> +
> + pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pwm) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
No need for this error message.
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + pwm->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
devm_clk_get()? Also, don't you want to keep a reference to the clock in
struct bcm2835_pwm so that you can disable the clock on driver removal?
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find clk: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(clk));
In text I prefer to use "clock" rather than "clk".
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, pwm);
No need for this. The point of the devm_*() functions is that you don't
have to manually clean up the resources that they manage.
> + return PTR_ERR(clk);
> + }
> +
> + pwm->scaler = (int)1000000000/clk_get_rate(clk);
There's NSEC_PER_SEC and you shouldn't cast this if you change the type
of scaler to unsigned long. So this becomes:
pwm->scaler = NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_get_rate(clk);
> +
> + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + pwm->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> + if (IS_ERR(pwm->mmio_base)) {
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, pwm);
Again, no need to free the memory here.
> + return PTR_ERR(pwm->mmio_base);
> + }
> +
> + start = r->start;
> + end = r->end;
> +
> + pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> + pwm->chip.ops = &bcm2835_pwm_ops;
> + pwm->chip.npwm = 2;
The Kconfig entry says that only a single PWM is implemented, so this
should be 1, shouldn't it?
> +
> + ret = pwmchip_add(&pwm->chip);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, pwm);
Drop this.
> + return -1;
This needs to propagate ret.
> + }
> +
> + /*set the pwm0 configuration*/
Spaces after /* and before */.
> + iowrite32((ioread32(pwm->mmio_base) & ~MASK_CTL_PWM)
> + | CTL_PWM, pwm->mmio_base);
Should this perhaps be delayed until the PWM is requested? What are the
consequences of configuring the PWM?
Also split this up into an explicit read/modify/write sequence please.
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I notice that you never prepare or enable the clock here. Perhaps this
isn't required because it's always on, but I think you should still call
clk_prepare_enable() here (and clk_disable_unprepare() in .remove()) to
make sure the driver is more portable.
> +
> +static int bcm2835_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +
Gratuitous blank line.
> + struct bcm2835_pwm_chip *pc;
> + pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
The above can go on a single line.
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!pc))
> + return -ENODEV;
There's no need for this check.
> +
> + return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id bcm2835_pwm_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "bcrm,pwm-bcm2835", },
s/bcrm/brcm/
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
Gratuitous blank line.
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm2835_pwm_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver bcm2835_pwm_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "pwm-bcm2835",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
No need to initialize .owner here. module_platform_driver() will do that
for you.
> + .of_match_table = bcm2835_pwm_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = bcm2835_pwm_probe,
> + .remove = bcm2835_pwm_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(bcm2835_pwm_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR(DRIVER_AUTHOR);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
A more natural ordering would be:
MODULE_AUTHOR(...);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION(...);
MODULE_LICENSE(...);
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpSTwW1dGb4v.pgp
Description: PGP signature