RE: [PATCH v6 2/4] net: moxa: replace build_skb() with netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() / memcpy()

[David Laight]

From: Arnd Bergmann
> On Monday 25 August 2014 16:22:22 Jonas Jensen wrote:
> > @@ -226,13 +226,15 @@ static int moxart_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> >                 if (len > RX_BUF_SIZE)
> >                         len = RX_BUF_SIZE;
> >
> > -               skb = build_skb(priv->rx_buf[rx_head], priv->rx_buf_size);
> > +               skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(ndev, len);
> > +
> >                 if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> > -                       net_dbg_ratelimited("build_skb failed\n");
> > +                       net_dbg_ratelimited("netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align failed\n");
> >                         priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
> >                         priv->stats.rx_errors++;
> >                 }
> >
> > +               memcpy(skb->data, priv->rx_buf[rx_head], len);

Is this memcpy() aligned?
If the hardware can receive to a 4n+2 offset it is probably better to
copy the two bytes before the frame data and to round the length of to
a whole number of words.

> >                 skb_put(skb, len);
> >                 skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
> >                 napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi, skb);
> 
> While this seems correct, I wonder why you don't do the normal approach of
> dequeuing the skb from the chain and adding a newly allocated skb to it to
> save the memcpy.

Because the receive buffer area isn't made of skbs.
Post-allocating the skb also reduces the 'true size' of the skb.

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/