Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] MFD: RK808: Add new mfd driver for RK808

[Chris Zhong]

On 08/26/2014 07:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > On 08/26/2014 06:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > > > On 08/26/2014 05:22 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > > > > > On 08/20/2014 05:21 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The RK808 chip is a power management IC for multimedia and handheld
> > > > > > > > devices. It contains the following components:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Regulators
> > > > > > > > - RTC
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The rk808 core driver is registered as a platform driver and provides
> > > > > > > > communication through I2C with the host device for the different
> > > > > > > > components.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > +	rk808->pdata = pdata;
> > > > > > > Remove pdata from 'struct rk808'.  You can obtain it from dev.
> > > > > > Can I keep this pdata in rk808, because it is used in the regulator driver.
> > > > > > The one obtain from dev maybe empty.
> > > > > If the one in dev is empty, you should populate that instead.
> > > > So, should I malloc a pada, and assign it to client->dev?
> > > If client->dev.pdata is NULL, yes.
> > >
> > > But actually, I have more important questions that need to be answered
> > > first.  Ones which I would normally be able to answer myself if the
> > > patch-set had been sent as one (i.e. threaded) instead of as
> > > individual patches:
> > >
> > > - What are you using pdata for?
> > For save some properties,
> >
> > like "rockchip,system-power-controller" in MFD
> > and some regulator properties in regulator/rk808...
> >
> > > - Where is pdata populated?
> > It is populated in probe in mfd/rk808.c
> >
> > actually, I copy it from tps65910.c
> >
> >
> > > - Where is pdata used?
> > pdata is used in mfd and regulator
> I'm still a little confused.  I see it being populated in the MFD
> driver, then I only see the attributes populated in the MFD driver
> used in the MFD driver and nowhere else?  I do see other attributes
> used in the regulator driver i.e. .of_node[], but these are then used
> only in the regulator driver, thus they shouldn't really be pdata.
>
> Let me put it another way:
>
> struct rk808_board {
> +       int irq;
> +       int irq_base;
> +       int wakeup;
> +       bool pm_off;
> +       struct regulator_init_data *rk808_init_data[rk808_NUM_REGULATORS];
> +       struct device_node *of_node[rk808_NUM_REGULATORS];
> +       int pmic_sleep_gpio;
> +       unsigned int dcdc_slp_voltage[3]; /* buckx_voltage in uV */
> +       unsigned int ldo_slp_voltage[7];
> +};
>
> For each of the above:
>
> - Can it be passed from platform data i.e. arch/<arch>/{plat,mach}-*?
> - Can it use local (not passed from driver to driver) variable instead?
>
> If the answer to the first question is 'no' and/or if the answer to
> the second question is 'yes', then it shouldn't be platform data.

Yes, if we have no dts file, these value can pass from mach-rk***.

It can be filled with all user setting of rk808, in a struct.

the latest struct is:

struct rk808_board {

    int wakeup;

    bool pm_off;

    struct regulator_init_data *rk808_init_data[RK808_NUM_REGULATORS];

    struct device_node *of_node[RK808_NUM_REGULATORS];

    unsigned int dcdc_slp_voltage[3]; /* buckx_voltage in uV */

    unsigned int ldo_slp_voltage[7];

};




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/