Re: [PATCH v5] mm: softdirty: enable write notifications on VMAs after VM_SOFTDIRTY cleared

From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Tue Aug 26 2014 - 11:53:58 EST


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:43:55PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 07:18:13PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > > Basically, it's safe if only soft-dirty is allowed to modify vm_flags
> > > without down_write(). But why is soft-dirty so special?
> >
> > because how we use this bit, i mean in normal workload this bit won't
> > be used intensively i think so it's not widespread in kernel code
>
> Weak argument to me.
>
> What about walk through vmas twice: first with down_write() to modify
> vm_flags and vm_page_prot, then downgrade_write() and do
> walk_page_range() on every vma?

I still it's undeeded, but for sure using write-lock/downgrade won't hurt,
so no argues from my side.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/