Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] dt: dependencies (for deterministic driver initialization order based on the DT)

[Alexander Holler]

Am 27.08.2014 09:16, schrieb Alexander Holler:

> Why should I? I've posted patches along with a lot of comments and
> explanations, and e.g. you are just talking that it should be made like
> my patches already did. And others do talk too like my patches and the
> accompanying comments from me which explain most stuff never have
> existed and just repeat what the patches already do without refering to
> them.

Just to repeat myself:

These patches which started this thread are not just some ideas without 
any sense for the amount of work necessary to implement them (as seen so 
often).

These patches are real working code everyone can apply to the mentioned 
kernel version and see what happens with his board. They are even 
checkpatched to avoid bean counting discussion.

(Don't forget to use patch 10/9 too)

Regards,

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/