Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] ftracetest: Initial commit for ftracetest

[Luis Henriques]

Hi,

Not really a complete review, but just 2 comments on this script:

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:15:18AM +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
...
> +prlog() { # messages
> +  echo $@ | tee -a $LOG_FILE
> +}
> +catlog() { #file
> +  cat $1 | tee -a $LOG_FILE
> +}
> +
> +# Testcase management
> +PASSED_CASES=
> +FAILED_CASES=
> +CASENO=0
> +testcase() { # testfile
> +  CASENO=$((CASENO+1))
> +  prlog -n "[$CASENO]"`grep "^#[ \t]*description:" $1 | cut -f2 -d:`
> +}
> +failed() {
> +  prlog -e "\t[FAIL]"
> +  FAILED_CASES="$FAILED_CASES $CASENO"
> +}
> +passed() {
> +  prlog -e "\t[PASS]"
> +  PASSED_CASES="$PASSED_CASES $CASENO"
> +}

What I see here is a '-e' being echo'ed and not really a '-e' switch
being used to 'echo'.  (Also, I'm not sure if this is a standard
switch...).

This applies to all the other 'prlog -e'.

> +
> +
> +# Run one test case
> +run_test() { # testfile
> +  local testname=`basename $1`
> +  local testlog=`mktemp --tmpdir=$LOG_DIR ${testname}-XXXXXX.log`
> +  testcase $1
> +  echo "execute: "$1 > $testlog
> +  (cd $TRACING_DIR; set -x ; source $t) >> $testlog 2>&1
> +  ret=$?

I believe the usage of 'source' is a bashism, and '.' should be used
instead.  In my environment, 'source' results in ret=127.  Replacing
it by '.' fixes it.

Cheers,
--
Luís
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/