Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs

[Andy Lutomirski]

On 08/27/2014 02:46 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I assume (because I wasn't told!) that there are two objectives here:
> 
> 1) reduce memory consumption by not maintaining pagecache and
> 2) reduce CPU cost by avoiding the double-copies.
> 
> These things are pretty easily quantified.  And really they must be
> quantified as part of the developer testing, because if you find
> they've worsened then holy cow, what went wrong.
> 

There are two more huge ones:

3) Writes via mmap are immediately durable (or at least they're durable
after a *very* lightweight flush).

4) No page faults ever once a page is writable (I hope -- I'm not sure
whether this series actually achieves that goal).

A note on #3: there is ongoing work to enable write-through memory for
things like this.  Once that's done, then writes via mmap might actually
be synchronously durable, depending on chipset details.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/