Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 08/27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Oleg, this is unacceptable.
>
> Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels
> of a merge window.  We are backlogged like crazy and being
> rude doesn't help one iota.

Me? Rude??

I really hope that this is the first (and last) email from me which
can be interpreted this way ;)

Trust me this was not intentional, and I am sorry if it looked
like it.

> On August 27, 2014 11:51:38 AM PDT, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
> >
> >And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before.
> >Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but
> >perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody
> >can do this.
> >
> >Oleg.
> >
> > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h |    2 +-
> > arch/x86/kernel/process.c           |   16 +++++++++-------
> > arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c        |    2 --
> > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c        |    1 -
> > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/