Re: [PATCH] acpi: fan.c: printk replacement

From: Sudip Mukherjee
Date: Thu Aug 28 2014 - 08:30:10 EST


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:26:58AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:27:47 AM Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:22:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 01:59:02 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 23:02 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 09:00:39 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:45:20AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Friday, August 22, 2014 05:33:21 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > > > > > printk replaced with corresponding dev_err and dev_info
> > > > > > > > fixed one broken user-visible string
> > > > > > > > multiine comment edited for correct commenting style
> > > > > > > > asm/uaccess.h replaced with linux/uaccess.h
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/acpi/fan.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/fan.c b/drivers/acpi/fan.c
> > > > > > > > index 8acf53e..7900d55 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/fan.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/fan.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> > > > > > > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > > > > #include <linux/init.h>
> > > > > > > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > > > > > > -#include <asm/uaccess.h>
> > > > > > > > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > > > > > > > #include <linux/thermal.h>
> > > > > > > > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > @@ -127,8 +127,9 @@ static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops fan_cooling_ops = {
> > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > - Driver Interface
> > > > > > > > - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> > > > > > > > + * Driver Interface
> > > > > > > > + * --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > +*/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > static int acpi_fan_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > @@ -143,7 +144,7 @@ static int acpi_fan_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > result = acpi_bus_update_power(device->handle, NULL);
> > > > > > > > if (result) {
> > > > > > > > - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Setting initial power state\n");
> > > > > > > > + dev_err(&device->dev, PREFIX "Setting initial power state\n");
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > While at it, please define a proper pr_fmt() for this file and get rid of PREFIX
> > > > > > > too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Otherwise I don't see a compelling reason to apply this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > Since in the patch I am not using any pr_* , so I am unable to understand why
> > > > > > you are asking for a proper pr_fmt().
> > > > >
> > > > > Never mind, I was confused somehow, not exactly sure why. Sorry about that.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I can get rid of the PREFIX . Then should I use pr_* in the patch instead of dev_* ?
> > > > > > My understanding was dev_* is more preffered than pr_*.
> > > > > > waiting for your suggestion on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, that really depends on the particular case. It really is better to use
> > > > > dev_err() here, but then PREFIX with it is not really useful, so please just
> > > > > drop PREFIX from the new messages.
> > > >
> > > > PREFIX is "ACPI: " so I think the idea is
> > > > to be able to grep for that.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how useful that is in this particular case. You can grep for "power
> > > state" istead just fine ...
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > Then there is one more printk which prints fan state is on or off :
> >
> > >dev_info(&device->dev, PREFIX "%s [%s] (%s)\n",
> > > acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
> > > !device->power.state ? "on" : "off");
> >
> > So if we drop the PREFIX and if some one wants to grep for this fan on/off , then how to do that ..
> > after removing PREFIX , in dmesg I am getting it as :
> > [ 2.056204] fan PNP0C0B:00: Fan [FAN0] (off)
> > [ 2.056225] fan PNP0C0B:01: Fan [FAN1] (off)
> > [ 2.056245] fan PNP0C0B:02: Fan [FAN2] (off)
> > [ 2.056263] fan PNP0C0B:03: Fan [FAN3] (off)
> > [ 2.056283] fan PNP0C0B:04: Fan [FAN4] (off)
>
> $ dmesg | grep fan
>
> ?
>
> You can simply say "ACPI fan [%s] (%s)\n", acpi_device_bid(device) " in that
> dev_info too.
>
> Rafael
>
I was under the impression that grep means using git grep and searching in the kernel code.
Anyways, I have sent a modified patch , can you please review it ..

thanks
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/