Re: [PATCH] doc: memory-barriers.txt: Correct example for reorderings

[Pranith Kumar]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
>> <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I would have
>> > expected the "x"s to be replaced with "y"s and vice versa.  But the
>> > ordering of the various combinations does not matter, and each line
>> > looks OK.
>>
>> Since x = A was replaced by x = B and y = B was replaced by y = A, I
>> just converted all x = load A to x = load B. Similarly for y. I think
>> we can do either this or as you suggested replacing x's with y's.
>
> Fair enough.  The other thing that confused me was the "STORE B=4,"
> showing up early in your replacement.
>

So I converted

STORE A=3, x=LOAD A->3

to

STORE B=4, x=LOAD B->4

since the later load into x wanted an updated value of B and not the
default. That is the reason you see STORE B = 4  in place of STORE A =
3


-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/