Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: mvebu: Fix clk frequency value if SSCG is enabled

[Gregory CLEMENT]

Hi Sebastian,

On 29/08/2014 14:48, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 01:43 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> When the SSCG (Spread Spectrum Clock Generator) is enabled, it shifts
>> the frequency of the clock. The percentage is no more than 1% but when
>> the clock is used for a timer it leads to a clock drift.
>>
>> This patch allows to correct the affected clock when the SSCG is
>> enabled. The check is done in an new optional function related to each
>> SoC: is_sscg_enabled(). If this function is not present then no
>> correction is done on the clock frequency.
> 
> Gregory,
> 
> I think computing the SSCG inside the common clk part is a no-go. I
> flipped through KW, Dove, Armada 370, and Armada XP FS looking at
> SSCG config register layout. Guess what: Dove is different.


argh I checked all the other SoC excepting Dove! Sometime I wonder if
the Dove really belongs to the mvebu family

> 
> How about we have a .get_sscg_deviation() callback instead and move
> the one below to some common place where KW, Armada 370, and XP can
> set it for their callback struct?

I agree. Given the name of thie file the common place will be here.

Thanks,

Gregory

> 
> Sebastian
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/clk/mvebu/common.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c
>> index 25ceccf939ad..834d36cf79b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c
>> @@ -26,8 +26,78 @@
>>    * Core Clocks
>>    */
>>
>> +#define SSCG_CONF_MODE(reg)	(((reg) >> 16) & 0x3)
>> +#define SSCG_SPREAD_DOWN	0x0
>> +#define SSCG_SPREAD_UP		0x1
>> +#define SSCG_SPREAD_CENTRAL	0x2
>> +#define SSCG_CONF_LOW(reg)	(((reg) >> 8) & 0xFF)
>> +#define SSCG_CONF_HIGH(reg)	((reg) & 0xFF)
>> +
>>   static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
>>
>> +static u32 fix_sscg_deviation(struct device_node *np, u32 system_clk)
>> +{
>> +	struct device_node *sscg_np = NULL;
>> +	void __iomem *sscg_map;
>> +	u32 sscg_reg;
>> +	s32 low_bound, high_bound;
>> +	u64 freq_swing_half;
>> +
>> +	sscg_np = of_find_node_by_name(np, "sscg");
>> +	if (sscg_np == NULL) {
>> +		pr_err("cannot get SSCG register node\n");
>> +		return system_clk;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	sscg_map = of_iomap(sscg_np, 0);
>> +	if (sscg_map == NULL) {
>> +		pr_err("cannot map SSCG register\n");
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	sscg_reg = readl(sscg_map);
>> +	high_bound = SSCG_CONF_HIGH(sscg_reg);
>> +	low_bound = SSCG_CONF_LOW(sscg_reg);
>> +
>> +	if ((high_bound - low_bound) <= 0)
>> +		goto out;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * From the datasheet we got the following formula
>> +	 * Spread percentage = 1/96 * (H - L) / H
>> +	 * H = SSCG_High_Boundary
>> +	 * L = SSCG_Low_Boundary
>> +	 *
>> +	 * As the deviation is half of spread then it lead to the
>> +	 * following formula in the code.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * To avoid an overflow and not lose any significant digit in
>> +	 * the same time we have to use a 64 bit integer.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	freq_swing_half = (((u64)high_bound - (u64)low_bound)
>> +			* (u64)system_clk);
>> +	do_div(freq_swing_half, (2 * 96 * high_bound));
>> +
>> +	switch (SSCG_CONF_MODE(sscg_reg)) {
>> +	case SSCG_SPREAD_DOWN:
>> +		system_clk -= freq_swing_half;
>> +		break;
>> +	case SSCG_SPREAD_UP:
>> +		system_clk += freq_swing_half;
>> +		break;
>> +	case SSCG_SPREAD_CENTRAL:
>> +	default:
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	iounmap(sscg_map);
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	of_node_put(sscg_np);
>> +
>> +	return system_clk;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void __init mvebu_coreclk_setup(struct device_node *np,
>>   				const struct coreclk_soc_desc *desc)
>>   {
>> @@ -62,6 +132,10 @@ void __init mvebu_coreclk_setup(struct device_node *np,
>>   	of_property_read_string_index(np, "clock-output-names", 1,
>>   				      &cpuclk_name);
>>   	rate = desc->get_cpu_freq(base);
>> +
>> +	if (desc->is_sscg_enabled && desc->is_sscg_enabled(base))
>> +		rate = fix_sscg_deviation(np, rate);
>> +
>>   	clk_data.clks[1] = clk_register_fixed_rate(NULL, cpuclk_name, NULL,
>>   						   CLK_IS_ROOT, rate);
>>   	WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data.clks[1]));
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.h b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.h
>> index f968b4d9df92..495f94ff4c90 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.h
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.h
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct coreclk_soc_desc {
>>   	u32 (*get_tclk_freq)(void __iomem *sar);
>>   	u32 (*get_cpu_freq)(void __iomem *sar);
>>   	void (*get_clk_ratio)(void __iomem *sar, int id, int *mult, int *div);
>> +	bool (*is_sscg_enabled)(void __iomem *sar);
>>   	const struct coreclk_ratio *ratios;
>>   	int num_ratios;
>>   };
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/