Re: [PATCH 01/24] perf tools: Add a test for tracking with sched_switch
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Fri Aug 29 2014 - 11:19:56 EST
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
> > > not a requirement for this specific test.
>
> > I will keep that in mind.
>
> > > Applying!
>
> > Thank you!
>
> > AFAICT the other 20 patches still apply cleanly to your tree, so I am not
> > going to send any more for now.
>
> Ok, I'll try to process more of those, the db interface probably, after
> I try using it for some simple tests.
>
> About the PMU ones, that I would like to hear from other people dealing
> with that area, like Jiri or even PeterZ, that IIRC discussed sysfs
> interface aspects in the past, Jiri, Peter?
I reviewed those, but I remember not getting an answer
for my question about that
http://marc.info/?t=140533254600001&r=1&w=2
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/