Re: [RFC v1 0/3] driver-core: add asynch module loading support

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Sun Aug 31 2014 - 17:53:34 EST


Hello, Greg.

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 01:40:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Right, all (well almost all) I wanted is for individual drivers to declare
> > their probe() functions asynchronous and driver core scheduling async attach
> > and properly handle failures from it.
>
> Yes, that's what I want as well.
>
> Luis, care to redo the patches in this way? It should be a lot simpler
> (no messing around with init levels and linker fun...)

I don't think binding that switch to the driver is gonna work. This
is mainly about the behavior expected by the entity which initiated
module loading not about specific drivers. I'm fairly certain that
there are userland scripts which depend on synchronous device probing
on module loading, especially for storage devices, so we can't simply
mark, say, libata as needing async probing and do it always
asynchronously.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/