Re: [PATCH v2 13/17] locks: remove i_have_this_lease check from __break_lease

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:38:39AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I think that the intent of this code was to ensure that a process won't
> deadlock if it has one fd open with a lease on it and then breaks that
> lease by opening another fd. In that case it'll treat the __break_lease
> call as if it were non-blocking.
> 
> This seems wrong -- the process could (for instance) be multithreaded
> and managing different fds via different threads. I also don't see any
> mention of this limitation in the (somewhat sketchy) documentation.
> 
> Remove the check and the non-blocking behavior when i_have_this_lease
> is true.

This looks reasonable to me, but I'm always very worried about changing
userspace exposed behavior..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/