Re: [PATCH] kernel: add support for gcc 5

From: Joe Perches
Date: Thu Sep 04 2014 - 23:59:05 EST


On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 23:37 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 07:47 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 00:43 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >> > Most statements are already depending on GCC_VERSION, maybe we can just
> >> > unify all gcc specific headers to one, still trying to keep the file
> >> > organized? ;)
> > Maybe something like:
> >
> > gnu development of gcc will be more frequent and the use of
> > compiler-gcc<major>.h likely will not be convenient anymore.
> >
> > Integrate the individual compiler-gcc<major>.h files into
> > compiler-gcc.h.
>
> Please no. We have a similar file we maintain in our team that's supposed to
> do something very similar for kernel versions. It goes all the way back to
> 2.6.9 and it's a *horrible* mess.
>
> This is how compiler-gcc.h will end up looking in a while.

As gcc options are generally upward compatible,
I don't think it will but there's no great way
to predict the future.

It wouldn't be as complicated as say backports.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/