Re: [PATCH V3] irqchip:gic: change access of gicc_ctrl register to read modify write.

From: Arun Chandran
Date: Mon Sep 08 2014 - 04:52:43 EST


Hi Feng,

Is this patch still needed to fix perf calltrace?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/265814.html

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Feng Kan <fkan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> This change is made to preserve the GIC v2 releated bits in the
> GIC_CPU_CTRL register (also known as the GICC_CTLR register in spec).
> The original code only set the enable/disable group bit in this register.
> This code will preserve the bypass bits configured by the bootload except
> the enable/disable bit. The main reason for this change is to allow the
> bypass bits specified in the v2 spec to remain untouched by the current
> GIC code. In the X-Gene platform, the bypass functionality is not used
> and bypass must be disabled at all time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> V3 Changes:
> - Sorry, forgot to change the mask for cpu_init path
> assumed bootloader setup bits correctly.
> V2 Changes:
> - only mask off v2 bypass bits
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 341c601..3ca7995 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
> void __iomem *base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
> unsigned int cpu_mask, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + unsigned int ctrl_mask;
> int i;
>
> /*
> @@ -449,13 +450,29 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
>
> writel_relaxed(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> - writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> +
> + ctrl_mask = readl(base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);

readl_relaxed() here?

> +
> + /* Mask out the gic v2 bypass bits */
> + ctrl_mask &= 0x1e0;
> +
> + /* Enable group 0 */
> + ctrl_mask |= 0x1;
> + writel_relaxed(ctrl_mask, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> }
>
> void gic_cpu_if_down(void)
> {
> + unsigned int ctrl_mask;
> void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[0]);
> - writel_relaxed(0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> +
> + ctrl_mask = readl(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
readl_relaxed() here?

> + /*
> + * Disable grp enable bit, leave the bypass bits alone as changing
> + * them could leave the system unstable
> + */
> + ctrl_mask &= 0x1e0;
> + writel_relaxed(ctrl_mask, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> @@ -566,6 +583,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> {
> int i;
> u32 *ptr;
> + unsigned int ctrl_mask;
> void __iomem *dist_base;
> void __iomem *cpu_base;
>
> @@ -590,7 +608,15 @@ static void gic_cpu_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
>
> writel_relaxed(0xf0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> - writel_relaxed(1, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> +
> + ctrl_mask = readl(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);

readl_relaxed() here?

> +
> + /* Mask out the gic v2 bypass bits */
> + ctrl_mask &= 0x1e0;
> +
> + /* Enable group 0 */
> + ctrl_mask |= 0x1;
> + writel_relaxed(ctrl_mask, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> }
>

--Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/